<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>HB 356: The Democratic Plan to put over $1 billion back into the budget – without raising taxes</title>
		<description>Comments for HB 356: The Democratic Plan to put over $1 billion back into the budget – without raising taxes at http://www.tondeestavern.com , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.tondeestavern.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:52:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.tondeestavern.com/200902101088/hb-356-the-democratic-plan-to-put-over-1-billion-back-into-the-budget-without-raising-taxes.html#comment-530</link>
			<description>I am aware of a lock company in Lawrenceville, who three years ago was trying to sell of
subdivision locks and they made quite a point that we would not have to pay any sales taxes.
I could not get the State to even investigate. - capecoral</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:04:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.tondeestavern.com/200902101088/hb-356-the-democratic-plan-to-put-over-1-billion-back-into-the-budget-without-raising-taxes.html#comment-270</link>
			<description>I don't understand.
How exactly are sales taxes NOT being collected?
Is the Dept. of Rev. not doing its job? Then fix it!
Surely privatization would be much more costly. What can a private for-profit company do that a state agency couldn't do for non-profit? It kind of stinks.

I'm sorry. Inevitably, taxes are going to have to be raised. - Supersteve</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:13:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.tondeestavern.com/200902101088/hb-356-the-democratic-plan-to-put-over-1-billion-back-into-the-budget-without-raising-taxes.html#comment-218</link>
			<description>Your knowledge of the state's budget is no doubt superior to mine, but with all due respect Rep Fludd, your assertion that this legislation will generate over $1B in new state money seems exaggerated.

It's my understanding that the sales tax brings in on the order of one-third of the state's revenue, roundly $7B (1/3 of $21B).  You imply that the state fails to collect 15% of sales tax revenue?  (or say 20% considering that local collection will collects three-quarters of what is not now being collected)

Second, if privitization is so much more efficient, why not privatize the state's collection process?

Third, State level collection ostensibly is more uniform and subject to better oversight.  Many local governments are poorly run, and lack the economy of scale to efficiently collect sales taxes.  There are more than a dozen Georgia Counties with populations of 10,000 or less.  I wouldn't want last year's Lithonia government responsible for collecting state taxes.  The bill to me is another means for local pols to reward their favorites.

Last, this proposal smacks of the GOP's idea of local control, i.e. local control when the GOP has only local control.
 - Dave Bearse</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:14:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
