House Majority Leader Jerry Keen, like other tax-cut proponents, couldn’t give chapter and verse on the proposals’ benefits Friday. But generally speaking, he said the cuts will help an ailing economy.
“I know this,” Keen said. “Now is the time to lower the tax burden. It is certainly not the time to raise the tax burden.”
As I try to swallow the simmering rage that results when it dawns on me that such incapable people are actually running our state, let's work through Keen's logic a little bit. First off, the man can't name the benefits from the elimination of the corporate tax ... largely because the purported benefits - when placed in the context of our existing budget crisis and evaluated against similar efforts which have largely failed to produce the intended results - don't actually exist.
Of course, since Keen can't think of a single reason why this proposal would be a good thing, aside from repeating stale talking points (which, these days, is the norm for most Republicans in Atlanta), he opts to completely change the narrative entirely and absolutely make up an opposing argument to rebut ... which is 'well, by gosh, we surely can't raise taxes.' Granted, no one is actually suggesting we raise the corporate tax, but that's besides the point when you're peddling irrational economic fear.
And, if you're Keen and all you're interested in doing is selling what is no less than a boon for big businesses in Georgia - coming right on the heels of the other boon we just gave them via the The Georgia Power Ponzi Scheme - it's important to not deal with 'facts' or 'data' or 'statistical evidence' or 'rational thought' when making your arguments.

I disapprove of limiitng the job tax credit the hiring of the unemployed. The credit should apply to any new job whether it's awared to someone that's unemployed or not. A person moving to a new job almost always leaves a job vacancy to be filled. The provision as structed limits the job mobility of those already employed.
I dislike that a fixed $2,500 tax credit for each new job favors lower paying less than 40 hour a week jobs over higher paying jobs, the credit being a smaller fraction and hence subsidy as job pay increases. A tax credit based on a percentage of pay up to a maximum would better promote creation of higher paying jobs, as would a fixed credit plus a percentage. For example, a credit of say $1,000 plus 3% percent of annual pay up to say $75,000 would be on the order of being cost neutral, and would better promote creation of higher paying jobs.
Votes: +0
User Login
|
|
|
blog advertising is good for you |

JmacLocation: Athens, Georgia
I'm a native Augustan, now resident Athenian who leans center-to-left politically ... doing my best to do justly, love mercy and walk humbly.
Lend a Hand
- Action Aid
- Athens Area Homeless Shelter
- Cooperative Baptist Fellowship
- Carolina for Kibera
- Community Connection of Northeast Georgia
- Operation Hope
- Morningstar Treatment Services
- Foundation For Excellence
Daily Politics
- Matthew Yglesias
- Andrew Sullivan
- Marc Ambinder
- Daily Kos
- Josh Marshall
- My Due Diligence
- Wonk Room
- Open Left
- Street Prophets
- Blake Aued
- Jason Winders
- Jim Thompson
- The Other Athens
- Voice Of Moderation
- Oconee Democrat
- Peach Pundit
- Tondee's Tavern
- Political Insider
- Blog For Democracy
- Georgia Law Blog
- Drifting Through The Grift Going Through The Motions
Sports Links
- Georgia Sports Blog
- Dawg Sports
- Hey Jenny Slater
- Every Day Should Be Saturday
- The Sports Guy - Bill Simmons
- Boston Globe Red Sox Home Page
- Boston Dirt Dogs
Podcasts
Blogs I Know
- Antidisingenousmentarianism
- Athens World
- Being Amber Rhea
- Blessed Endurance
- Casa de Nicki
- Classic Ground
- Dave Akins
- Here's Your Holiday
- Hurricane Radio - Patrick Armstrong
- Martians Attacking Indianapolis
- Moonlight Through The Pines
- Now More Than Ever
- Pasqua and Stanicek
- Journal of the Roziers
- Spatial Mismatch
- Thought Struggle



